btw, I will commit something to the documentation in the next hours. I
am metioning this just to avoid merge conflicts.
Best,
Peter
Am 29.04.2015 um 13:18 schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
that would be great if you can create a patch for the documentation.
Best,
Peter
Am 29.04.2015 um 08:04 schri
Hi,
that would be great if you can create a patch for the documentation.
Best,
Peter
Am 29.04.2015 um 08:04 schrieb Renaud Richardet:
Hallo Peter,
Can you create a jira issue for it? I will take care of it then.
Excellent, here we go:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4368
* https
Hi,
(the mailing lists obiously have some problems right now (at least
commits and dev). Let's see when this mail arrives.)
can you take a look at the current trunk and resolve the issues in case
everything works as expected?
Best,
Peter
Am 28.04.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
s
Hallo Peter,
Can you create a jira issue for it? I will take care of it then.
>
Excellent, here we go:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4368
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4369
PS: You can of course also submit a patch for it, if you want :-)
I don't feel up to it at
Hi,
short answer: It makes sense :-)
There are maybe some problems in the grammars concerning types and
variables vs external actions, but I think it's worth the trouble.
Can you create a jira issue for it? I will take care of it then.
Best,
Peter
PS: You can of course also submit a patch
Hello,
I have been using Ruta a lot lately, and it has made me much more
productive. Thanks to all the people that contributed to it!
I have been thinking about two small syntax simplifications and was
wondering if they would make sense:
A) Types declarations (2.5.1)
// Types with features may
