RE: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-10-05 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
G in above world *log* !!! > > Thank you > > Ibrahim > > -Original Message- > From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:f...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 06:23 م > To: user@zookeeper.apache.org? > Subject: Re: 3-server Zab cluster > > > > On 05 Oct 2015,

RE: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-10-05 Thread Ibrahim El-sanosi (PGR)
ster >>>consistency and results in data loss. > > Yes, if the solution above (***) is not correct, you assumption makes sense. > > Ibrahim > > From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com > <mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com><mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com &

RE: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-10-05 Thread Ibrahim El-sanosi (PGR)
ency, we may provide this optimization (above algorithm) as optional. I hope my aim is clear now. Ibrahim -Original Message- From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:f...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 06:23 م To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: 3-server Zab cluster > On

Re: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-10-05 Thread Flavio Junqueira
. > > Yes, if the solution above (***) is not correct, you assumption makes sense. > > Ibrahim > > From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com > <mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com><mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com > <mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gma

Re: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-10-01 Thread Rakesh Radhakrishnan
is (small) optimization can only > work with 3-servers cluster. > > Who could confirm the optimization can work? > > Ibrahim > > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Shraer [mailto:shra...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:11 ص > To: user@zookeeper

Re: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-09-28 Thread Alexander Shraer
Committing locally when sending an ACK at a server would lead to loss of consistency - it is possible that this is the only server that acks, e.g., this server is temporarily disconnected from the leader, the leader gets re-elected and the operation is truncated from logs at other servers. Its ok

RE: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-09-28 Thread Ibrahim El-sanosi (PGR)
--Original Message- From: Alexander Shraer [mailto:shra...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 07:27 م To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: d...@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: 3-server Zab cluster Committing locally when sending an ACK at a server would lead to loss of c

Re: 3-server Zab cluster

2015-09-28 Thread Alexander Shraer
ate with L (pervious leader now become a follower), as a result Zxid10 > commits by new quorum. Is that correct? > > What do you think? > > Ibrahim > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Shraer [mailto:shra...@gmail.com] > Sent: M