Re: Mapping new syntax

2009-09-08 Thread Clinton Begin
49 AM, > >> faresz wrote: > >>> > >>> Does iBatis3 support the old syntax of iBatis 2 like if > >>> not > >>> so the migration from version 2 to 3 will affect all our > mapping/queries > >>> definitions and will

Re: Mapping new syntax

2009-09-08 Thread Jeff Butler
any >>> possibility to migrate without doing all the changes listed, or is there >>> any >>> tool that will help us to minimize this overhead? >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Mapping-new-syntax-tp25341397

Re: Mapping new syntax

2009-09-08 Thread faresz
l our mapping/queries >> definitions and will cause a big overhead for the company. Is there any >> possibility to migrate without doing all the changes listed, or is there >> any >> tool that will help us to minimize this overhead? >> -- >> View this message i

Re: Mapping new syntax

2009-09-08 Thread Jeff Butler
s message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Mapping-new-syntax-tp25341397p25341397.html > Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr

Mapping new syntax

2009-09-08 Thread faresz
help us to minimize this overhead? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mapping-new-syntax-tp25341397p25341397.html Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e