Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-14 Thread Clinton Begin
Thanks so much Francois, I appreciate the effort you applied to validating this. Cheers, Clinton 2010/5/14 François Schiettecatte > Clinton > > Ok this is interesting, I was able to reliably replicate the problem, I > even grabbed the source code and included in the source code tree of my > app

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-14 Thread François Schiettecatte
Clinton Ok this is interesting, I was able to reliably replicate the problem, I even grabbed the source code and included in the source code tree of my application and still got the issue, but... the server I am running this one was rebooted due to a power failure and now the problem has gone a

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-10 Thread François Schiettecatte
Clinton I am getting closer, I was able to make the issue go away by selectively rolling back some of the changes that were made between the two version around the handling of transaction and rollbacks. The problem is that I dont have sure-fire test case for this, I have to run a crawler for 3-

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-08 Thread François Schiettecatte
Clinton I understand, I am looking into it now, if I cant verify it before the weekend is over then I would say that something else is going on in my config. François On May 8, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Clinton Begin wrote: > Hi Francois, > > I can't recreate this problem. I've verified in about 10

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-08 Thread Clinton Begin
Hi Francois, I can't recreate this problem. I've verified in about 1000 unit tests with different configurations that close is being called. The only known and verified case of this was with the ManagedTransaction, not the JdbcTransaction. Perhaps you can put together a simple unit test with HS

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-07 Thread François Schiettecatte
Clinton Thanks for pinging me. I have not had a chance to look at it, and it is still an issue, before rushing out and creating a jira ticket for it I wanted to look at the code diffs between the two releases, I will try to get to it later today or this WE. François On May 7, 2010, at 10:33 A

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-07 Thread Clinton Begin
Let me know if this is still a problem, and create a JIRA ticket if it is. I should have some time this weekend to look into it. Clinton On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Clinton Begin wrote: > Two things to do: > > * Create a JIRA ticket for this. We'll continue conversation and > investigation

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-05 Thread Clinton Begin
Two things to do: * Create a JIRA ticket for this. We'll continue conversation and investigation there. * Mount the source and step through one example transaction. See if you can verify that close isn't being called, and possibly why. * Finally, out of curiosity, disable caching globally, and

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-05 Thread François Schiettecatte
Clinton A little more information on this, I reverted back to 240 and the problem I reported did not occurs after a 24 hour run. I then went to the current release and the problem reappeared, everything else is the same, so there is an issue. What it looks like is going on is that connections a

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-01 Thread Clinton Begin
Then no, I don't believe there have been any changes related to connections or transactions between those versions. You can have a look at the change log if you like: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10601&subset=-1 Or the subversion history as well. Clinton 2010/5/1

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-01 Thread François Schiettecatte
I am using JDBC, with C3P0 as my data source. Cheers François On May 1, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Clinton Begin wrote: > The only code changes related to that were with managed transactions. > Which transacion manager are you using? (JDBC or MANAGED)? > > Cheers, > Clinton > > 2010/5/1 François Schie

Re: interesting exception in 3.0

2010-05-01 Thread Clinton Begin
The only code changes related to that were with managed transactions. Which transacion manager are you using? (JDBC or MANAGED)? Cheers, Clinton 2010/5/1 François Schiettecatte : > Hi > > I grabbed the latest, greatest release of 3.0 from : > >         > http://people.apache.org/builds/ibatis/ib