-java@ibatis.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 20 Janvier 2009, 5h06mn 11s
Objet : Re: ibatis db pool or dbcp
both are production quality
dbcp is a more configurable but requires a 3rd party lib
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Rick ric...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Zsolt
Yes, they're both fine for production. iBATIS SimpleDataSource has been
around since iBATIS 1.0 and has changed very little (but it does get a major
facelift in iBATIS 3.0). The difference between the iBATIS SimpleDataSource
and most others is that it's a synchronous datasource. That is, it
PS: If you're using an application server, my recommendation is to use the
container managed DataSource... always always always...
Cheers,
Clinton
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Clinton Begin clinton.be...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, they're both fine for production. iBATIS SimpleDataSource has
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Clinton Begin clinton.be...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: If you're using an application server, my recommendation is to use the
container managed DataSource... always always always...
I'm just curious why? Is it because of possible monitoring tools (like
maybe a
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Zsolt Koppany zkoppanyl...@intland.com wrote:
Hi,
which database pool is recommended for production usage? The pool shipped
with ibatis or dbcp?
We use ibatis 2.3.4.726.
I'm curious about this also. I heard the ibatis common pool is fine
for production. Are
both are production quality
dbcp is a more configurable but requires a 3rd party lib
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Rick ric...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Zsolt Koppany zkoppanyl...@intland.com
wrote:
Hi,
which database pool is recommended for production usage?
