Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Peter wrote: I don't run TT mode UMLs. So, no I haven't tried that. I don't know about the sighandler. The program runs as it was listed. It is running on a 'regular' server (Debian, and/or WBL3) with other processes running. And the host servers happen to be running other UMLs. I don't know

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Peter
I don't run TT mode UMLs. So, no I haven't tried that. I don't know about the sighandler. The program runs as it was listed. It is running on a 'regular' server (Debian, and/or WBL3) with other processes running. And the host servers happen to be running other UMLs. I don't know if that info

[uml-devel] Again split-arch patches

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Attached are 2 further patches, that are needed for my s390 port. I have tested on i386 in 2.6.10-rc3-mm1 + incremental patches (without skas0) in TT and SKAS and didn't see errors. Bodo split-subarch-patches3.tar Description: Unix tar archive

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Bodo Stroesser wrote: Carl wrote: Hi, Running the piece of code from the URL below is generating errors on various UML kernels: http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/memtest.c Kernels tested are: 2.4.27, 2.4.27-bs1, 2.6.9-bb4. Sorry for forgetting to attach the testtool. Here it is. Bodo Different UML h

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Carl wrote: Hi, Running the piece of code from the URL below is generating errors on various UML kernels: http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/memtest.c Kernels tested are: 2.4.27, 2.4.27-bs1, 2.6.9-bb4. Different UML host servers have been tried too, and only UMLs running on SMP (dual Xeon) servers se

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Peter wrote: I don't recall seeing an error where the obs and exp were equal. I saw plenty where they were not equal. The code is pretty simple: double observed = a[i]; double expected = (double) i; if (observed != expected) { printf ("failed at i=%u, k=%u (obs %.18g vs exp %.18g)\n",i

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Peter
I don't recall seeing an error where the obs and exp were equal. I saw plenty where they were not equal. The code is pretty simple: double observed = a[i]; double expected = (double) i; if (observed != expected) { printf ("failed at i=%u, k=%u (obs %.18g vs exp %.18g)\n",i, k,observed, e

[uml-devel] ease the pain

2004-12-22 Thread Ollie Mcgee
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:27:20 -0500 Wholesale Rx - http://baltic.kejdjmim.info/?zlBX5b40D8ah2z3permissive Take A Step Into The Future And Join The Millions Of People Already Using Rx Meds Online. Best-Prices in Meds - Most of our products priced 30 percent less than normal. No Prior Rx Required -

Re: [uml-devel] Memory corruption/errors?

2004-12-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Carl wrote: Hi, Running the piece of code from the URL below is generating errors on various UML kernels: http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/memtest.c Kernels tested are: 2.4.27, 2.4.27-bs1, 2.6.9-bb4. Different UML host servers have been tried too, and only UMLs running on SMP (dual Xeon) servers se