[uml-devel] uml_switch query

2005-01-11 Thread Adil Mujeeb, Noida
Hi, I have some questiosn related to uml switch 1. When we attach uml switch with tap device, what should be the command for it. I haev used: a) uml_switch -unix /tmp/uml1 -tap tap10 But when we configure the device of UML, its not working: uml_mconsole umid configure eth0=daemon,,unix,/t

[uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls

2005-01-11 Thread blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it
--- Additional Comments From blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it 2005-01-12 02:09 --- I'll test it against an updated glibc if and when I'll have time, but anyway I have no reason to doubt on you. And sorry a lot... I didn't want to "rumble", just to be complete. Detailed excuses follow

[uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails

2005-01-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||user-mode-linux- |

[uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls

2005-01-11 Thread drepper at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-01-12 01:45 --- These confused ramblings are not helping at all. Is it so hard to write I have this test program. When I run it like this I expect this output. And reading "This is tested with any recent glibc" makes me w

[uml-devel] [Bug 43616] gcc 3.3.2 cannot link usermode sources (2.4.24-r1 & 2.6.3-r1)

2005-01-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43616 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||user-mode-linux- |

[uml-devel] Your Bugzilla password.

2005-01-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: E-mail address: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Password: 6eXFx70qgT To change your password, go to: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi --- The SF.Net email is

[uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls

2005-01-11 Thread blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it
-- What|Removed |Added CC||user-mode-linux-devel at ||lists dot sourceforge dot

[uml-devel] Your Bugzilla password.

2005-01-11 Thread sourceware-bugzilla
To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: E-mail address: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Password: Y_caJERs To change your password, go to: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi --- The SF.Net

Re: [uml-devel] df -h and hostfs

2005-01-11 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > when df -h does a statfs, hostfs statfs'es /, instead of the mount-source > directory, I.e. the one you see in the mount point inside UML... > so you get the wrong stats about free-space if the mounted > directory does not originate from

Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?

2005-01-11 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 22:34, Michael Richardson wrote: > > "Rob" == Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rob> Chapter 5 of current variants of LFS uses the host system to > Rob> create a toolchain you can chroot into and build the final > Rob> system with. Then in chapt

Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?

2005-01-11 Thread Michael Richardson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > "Rob" == Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> Chapter 5 of current variants of LFS uses the host system to Rob> create a toolchain you can chroot into and build the final Rob> system with. Then in chapter 6, you build the final system

[uml-devel] Hang on Reboot

2005-01-11 Thread Rus Foster
I've just built a 2.4.29-rc1 kernel with BB's uml-2.4.27-bs1.patch and uml-patch-2.4.24-1base.patch upon issuing a reboot the UML just sits there after INIT: Finish all processes (or similar) I can see a 2.6.x patch which looks like it would fix it but any idea on 2.4. BTW running in SKAS mode

[uml-devel] Re: Bug in for-each-cpu-akpm from incrementals

2005-01-11 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > You think that for_each_cpu() only iterates over online CPU, while you > should use for_each_online_cpu() for this purpose. Fixed in my tree, but there was method to my madness. I spotted this while reading the 2.6.10 patch, which has this: @@ -207,9 +212,8 @@ int sho

Re: [uml-devel] kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:277!

2005-01-11 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:277! > Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG! A bit of googling turns up http://kerneltrap.org/node/4119 making this look like a generic kernel bug. Jeff -

Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?

2005-01-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Rob Landley wrote: Don't have a real partition to mount it on, unless I want to cannibalize the host system's swap. I could try ubd if you think it would help. You are likely to experience less bugs using ubd than hostfs. /dev/console attaches to fd0 and fd1. These are not tt

[uml-devel] df -h and hostfs

2005-01-11 Thread stian
when df -h does a statfs, hostfs statfs'es /, instead of the mount-source directory, so you get the wrong stats about free-space if the mounted directory does not originate from the / host partition. Stian --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by:

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Put the check for NULL before the use of a potentially-null value

2005-01-11 Thread Gerd Knorr
> - line = tty->driver_data; > if (tty != NULL) { > + line = tty->driver_data; > Sorry, a little question: against what tree does it apply? Any cutting edge tree (both latest -mm and latest Linus -bk snapshot). > I hope I'll not forget it... I think it can go to andr