Re: [uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails

2005-02-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 07:38 PST > --- Could someone please update me with the status of this bug? Are > there still problems? > > I notice that the latest version in portage is based on 2

[uml-devel] uml 2.4.27-1um lockup at halt/reboot (strace)

2005-02-09 Thread McGroarty
One of my machines' guests do not exit properly when "shutdown -h now" is run from the guest. Instead the guest locks up forever and needs a kill -9. The offending machine runs 2.6.8.10-skas3 host, 2.4.27-1um guest, and is an SMP machine (P4 HT). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tail -20 dumpy.txt munmap(0x

[uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 13:58 PST --- Yes, upgrading would partially help. Alternatively, using a non-NPTL glibc is a workaround (but things get slower); using the latest, ~x86 glibc, built without the np

RE: [uml-devel] strace of "ls" under Fedora Core 3

2005-02-09 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
> As a quick reminder, Marion and Bill are trying to get >i386 fedora >core 3 running under uml (2.6.4, with the i386 emulation code) on ford >(x86_64). The uml binaries don't have TLS support, so we've renamed >all of: /lib/tls. /usr/lib/tls, and /usr/X11R6/lib/tls directories. >

[uml-devel] strace of "ls" under Fedora Core 3

2005-02-09 Thread Marion Bates
[this is Marion channeling Bill.] As a quick reminder, Marion and Bill are trying to get i386 fedora core 3 running under uml (2.6.4, with the i386 emulation code) on ford (x86_64). The uml binaries don't have TLS support, so we've renamed all of: /lib/tls. /usr/lib/tls, and /usr/X11R6/lib/tls

[uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 07:38 PST --- Could someone please update me with the status of this bug? Are there still problems? I notice that the latest version in portage is based on 2.6.8.1. Would upgradin