This happens everytime i try to load an application of ours that
uses shmem for syslog...
Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
i know things are hot and heavy in 2.6 but i hope somebody can spare a
thought about this panic i'm struggling to understand.
Is this easily reproduced?
The stack isn
thank you very very much jeff.
i'll apply and let you know.
very much looking forward to the 'update/moderinization' of the 2.4 series.
Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
here's a wonderfully infrequent but nagging startup failure that
usually has a useless (no stack depth, or just corrupt)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> here's a wonderfully infrequent but nagging startup failure that
> usually has a useless (no stack depth, or just corrupt) backtrace...
You need the uml-enable-the-timer-after-the-timer-handler.patch patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/pat
My UML was idle for 18 hours. When looking to the console,
I found the following messages, UML still is running:
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
EIP: :[<>] CPU: 0 Not tainted EFLAGS:
Not tainted
EAX: EBX: ECX: EDX:
ESI: EDI:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 05:07:09PM -0400, Andr? Pedralho wrote:
> The first step would be create this uml. Then I'll think in a way to
> execute this, cause it'll be compiled for arm!
You could try QEmu for that:
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/index.html
Chris
-
