[uml-devel] Re: Fixing fp-state handling

Blaisorblade wrote: From arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: /* XXX These need to use [GS]ETFPXREGS and copy_sc_{to,from}_user_skas needs * to pass in a sufficiently large buffer */ Could fixing this be the real fix instead of "fp-state" in the incrementals? Sorry, no, it could't. fp-state fix

[uml-devel] Re: Testing GCOV handling in -bk

On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 12:42 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > Anton, would you test the current -bk tree for the CONFIG_GCOV problem and > the > patch I and Jeff put together? > > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.11-bk8/patches/weak_gcov_init > > The above should fix the s

[uml-devel] multicast problem in UML

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not able to exchange multicast packets between two UMLs using tuntap transport type but it works for uml_switch daemon. The steps followed are: [host]#./linux umid=uml1 ubd0=Debian-3.0r0.ext2 init=/sh eth0=tuntap,,,132.186.0.253 con=port:9977 con0=fd:0,