[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] [RFC] uml: add and use generic hw_controller_type->release

2005-05-28 Thread Chris Wedgwood
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:26:15PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Well, that's a point, even because a conditional jump needs to flush > the pipeline when mispredicted (which won't happen on other ARCHs > after the initial period, if this jump stays in the Branch Target > Buffers). Because it's cru

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 4/4] uml: make it link in tt mode against NPTL glibc

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 06:20, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:40:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To make sure switcheroo() can execute when we remap all the executable > > image, we used a trick to make it use a local copy of errno... this trick > > does not work with NPTL glibc

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/7] UML - Turn off kmalloc always on a fatal signal

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 03:16, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:13:02PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > This and some of the other patches are changing the formatting. The new > > line above is using spaces instead of a tab. > > On purpose - I'm making UML more CodingStyle conformant, and

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] [RFC] uml: add and use generic hw_controller_type->release

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 04:11, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:39:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris > > Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [...] > > > This is heavily based on s

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 05:31, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 15:33, David Howells wrote: > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400 as > > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE > > include/asm-*/thre