On Friday 17 June 2005 00:23, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:51:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > And also it makes tt a bit more removable, if Jeff decides to.
> > Well, on this point I'd be cautious.
> > Currently there is no way to even test UML in SMP mode other than using
On Friday 17 June 2005 02:35, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:09:34PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > +struct task_struct;
> > +extern void arch_switch(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct
> > *to);
> Is the task_struct; needed, considering that there is get_task returning
> o
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:51:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
And also it makes tt a bit more removable, if Jeff decides to.
Well, on this point I'd be cautious.
Currently there is no way to even test UML in SMP mode other than using TT
mode, so at least this must be solved
