On Friday 02 September 2005 23:02, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > * The first 2 patches modify the PTE encoding macros and start preparing
> > the VM for the new situation (i.e. VMA which have variable protections,
> > which are called VM_NONUNIFORM. I dropped th
Ok, SYSEMU has been in -mm during 2.6.13 development and is now being merged
in mainline, without many problems - it should be in Linus's git repository.
However, the point is that *I* have a problem with its current API.
Charles P. Wright expressed interest in using the interface, on private ma
On Monday 22 August 2005 06:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use LTP to test uml,
Which UML release, sorry? I've tried to reproduce it (yes, in TT mode) lightly
and I failed, so I've thought to ask you first.
I've tested a very recent 2.6 kernel with chmod() and chown() (custom
testprogram, very
On Friday 02 September 2005 18:59, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:06:33PM -0400, Allan Graves wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > Here's the patches. Hope these meet your approval!
Could you please write a proper changelog? Reading a patch is possible, but
needs time which I don't have in the ver
On Friday 02 September 2005 22:17, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch.
> + WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte));
> This one has been firing on me, and I dec
