On Thursday 22 September 2005 22:37, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:20:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > sysrq t is broken (and stays),
> There's a fix on the way for that.
Already found? Nice.
> This has nothing to do with interrupt
> context anyway.
> > but additionally there
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
>
> Exactly - the point is: is it legal to call copy_from_user() while holding a
> spinlock (which is my original question)? Or should copy_from_user try to
> satisfy the fault, instead of seeing in_atomic() or something similar and
> fail?
It is not l
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 22:45, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:06:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > The block layer is supposed to merge as far as possible overlapping
> > writes, that's reasonable, but not dependable. Say it gets the
> > overlapping request *after* it sent t
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:20:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> sysrq t is broken (and stays),
There's a fix on the way for that. This has nothing to do with interrupt
context anyway.
> but additionally there are some warnings from
> some commands (enable sleep inside spinlock checking and spi
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 22:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 21:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > From: Pao
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 22:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 21:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 22:50, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Things are breaking horribly with sysrq called in interrupt context. I
> > want to try to fi
On Thursday 22 September 2005 14:08, Rickard Vikström wrote:
> Hi uml-people
>
> I have problem with hostkernel 2.6.12-skas3-v8.2 to start a guest.
> This is the output:
> ./2.4.29 eth0=tuntap,tap_bf,00:11:2F:87:09:02 ubd0=debian20gigg.iso
> mem=512M
> and the hangup is here:
> kjournald startin
Hi uml-people
I have problem with hostkernel 2.6.12-skas3-v8.2 to start a guest.
This is the output:
./2.4.29 eth0=tuntap,tap_bf,00:11:2F:87:09:02 ubd0=debian20gigg.iso
mem=512M
and the hangup is here:
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data
