Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] slight UML config simplification.

2006-01-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:37:17PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > Understood. Is there any way to autodetect this at runtime? Not sure, that would be nice. It would have to look at its own maps and figure out that two pages mapped at the top of memory are the stub pages of the outer UML. That seem

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] slight UML config simplification.

2006-01-27 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 27 January 2006 12:08, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 06:37:25PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > Start with "nesting level". > > Actually, NEST_LEVEL is needed for skas0 because of the stub pages. They > need to be relocated in a nested UML. So, I'm dropping this patch. Under

[uml-devel] [PATCH 1/1] UML - compilation fix when MODE_SKAS disabled

2006-01-27 Thread Jeff Dike
This is 2.6.16 material. From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch fixes the following compilation error when CONFIG_SKAS is disabled: CC arch/um/sys-i386/ldt.o arch/um/sys-i386/ldt.c:19:21: proc_mm.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/ldt.o] Error 1 Signed

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] slight UML config simplification.

2006-01-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 06:37:25PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > Start with "nesting level". Actually, NEST_LEVEL is needed for skas0 because of the stub pages. They need to be relocated in a nested UML. So, I'm dropping this patch. BTW, the other config options which needed to be made dependent