On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:00, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:36:58PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > 2) write_sigio_thread should do a "down" on a semaphore/mutex and the
> > first update_thread should "up" it. As usually, this semaphore would be
> > indeed implemented as a pipe.
>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:36:58PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> 2) write_sigio_thread should do a "down" on a semaphore/mutex and the first
> update_thread should "up" it. As usually, this semaphore would be indeed
> implemented as a pipe.
Is there anything wrong with this:
Index: linux-2.6.15/
Blaisorblade wrote:
> 2) write_sigio_thread should do a "down" on a semaphore/mutex and the first
> update_thread should "up" it. As usually, this semaphore would be indeed
> implemented as a pipe.
Be the way, in case a proper fix is too involved for 2.6.16.x,
here's a quick and dirty work-aroun
