And, BTW, you should probably send the TLS stuff in this week if you
want it to go into 2.6.17 easily.
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends application
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:03:57PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Code which two people aren't able to understand until two years later _wants_
> at least some comments and if possible restructuring.
I'd say this is more of an oversight than obscure code that the author
doesn't even understand.
>
On Saturday 25 March 2006 17:01, Mikado wrote:
> Thank D. Bahi and Blaisorblade for your replies.
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 24 March 2006 04:25, Mikado wrote:
> > What happens? Maybe gdb is stepping there but the calls are inlined and
> > it's not apparent that it's looking at source co
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Why uml-add-tls-support-debug-check-never-works is needed (was:
Re: Fwd: Proposed additions to the ptrace(2) manpage, take 2)
Date: Sunday 26 March 2006 19:43
From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMA
Hi,
I recently tried to benchmark the new AIO-based ubd driver (including
O_DIRECT), and ran into serious problems with filesystems > 4GB. I think
I found the problem; two overflows in ubd_kern.c (see patch).
My test system was 2.6.16 plus all patches from user-mode-linux.sf.net
minus no_cow_odir
