RE: [uml-devel] Re: SMP skas requirements

2006-03-30 Thread Anthony Brock
> On Thursday 30 March 2006 13:30, Blaisorblade wrote: > Sorry, forgot to finish. That patch keeps checking TMP,TMPDIR and > TEMP (don't > remember the order), but if none is set, it switches the default > from /tmp > to /dev/shm. This makes sense. It does appear that the patch first checks the en

Re: [uml-devel] Re: SMP skas requirements

2006-03-30 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 30 March 2006 23:03, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 22:38, Anthony Brock wrote: > > Quoting Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:40:00AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > >> Finally, I'd like to get devshm merged if there aren't problems with >

Re: [uml-devel] Re: SMP skas requirements

2006-03-30 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 22:38, Anthony Brock wrote: > Quoting Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:40:00AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > >> Finally, I'd like to get devshm merged if there aren't problems with the > >> code. > > That one needs to check if /dev/shm is pres

Re: [uml-devel] Integer overflows in new AIO ubd driver

2006-03-30 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:16:27PM +0200, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Almost: > > iozone -i 0 -i 1 -r 64k -s 5G -e -f /Data/testfile -U /Data > > i.e. record size is 64K, and there is a umount/mount between the > runs. /Data is an ext3 filesystem with 4k block size, on a 20 G > partition. OK, this d