Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.17-rc1 with hardened gcc

2006-04-03 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 03 April 2006 22:43, Antoine Martin wrote: > I thought I'd give it a try. > I guess that these aren't bugs (since switching to non-hardened gcc > fixes most problems) but maybe this is useful to someone? > Otherwise just ignore most issues in this email. Don't worry, I've got and solved

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC][PATCH] include /usr/lib/uml in PATH

2006-04-03 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 02 April 2006 21:54, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > [...] > > > > --- a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 2006-04-02 16:32:38.340801686 +0200 > > > +++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 20

[uml-devel] 2.6.17-rc1 with hardened gcc

2006-04-03 Thread Antoine Martin
I thought I'd give it a try. I guess that these aren't bugs (since switching to non-hardened gcc fixes most problems) but maybe this is useful to someone? Otherwise just ignore most issues in this email. - the configs are available at http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/kernels - GCC 3.4.5 hardened First, th

[uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - TLS fixlets

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Dike
Two small TLS fixes - arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/tls.c uses errno and -E* so it should include errno.h __setup_host_supports_tls returns 1, but as an initcall, it should return 0 Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2.6.16/arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/tls.c