Reply-To: cecarl
http://straitgateministry.net/
345-page ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL Almost FREE (see end)
Published by Truths Press
ENABLING WAR: HOW A BIBLE PUBLISHER CORRUPTED CHRIST'S WORDS
Why Celebrity leaders accept a form of Judaism and call it "Christianity"
By Charles E. Carlson (Director o
Hi,
I was looking at the code of the UML and more precisely at the functions
set_task_sizes_tt and set_task_sizes_skas. I noticed that these 2
functions take a paramater (arg) which is not used : the function is
always called with the value 0.
I suppose that this value might change in the future
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:50:57PM +0200, Nikola Knezevic wrote:
> On 5/22/06, Nikola Knezevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This is the culprit:
> >static inline void remap_stack(int fd, unsigned long offset)
> >{
> >__asm__ volatile ("movl %%eax,%%ebp ; movl %0,%%eax ; int $0x80 ;"
> >
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:11:11PM +0200, Nikola Knezevic wrote:
> Hi all,
> When I change Makefile to have -O0 instead of -O2, this is what I get
> after make ARCH=um:
I don't think the kernel will build at all with -O0.
Jeff
On 5/22/06, Nikola Knezevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the culprit:
static inline void remap_stack(int fd, unsigned long offset)
{
__asm__ volatile ("movl %%eax,%%ebp ; movl %0,%%eax ; int $0x80 ;"
"movl %7, %%ebx ; movl %%eax, (%%ebx)"
Hi all,
When I change Makefile to have -O0 instead of -O2, this is what I get
after make ARCH=um:
CC arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o
arch/um/include/sysdep/stub.h: In function 'remap_stack':
arch/um/include/sysdep/stub.h:90: warning: asm operand 7 probably
doesn't match constraints
arch/um/incl
Greetings,
While working on a syscall emulator similar in structure to
user-mode-linux, I found that for many but not all system calls, the
ptracing parent is notified of the system call exit twice on x86_64 hosts.
This can be trivially demonstrated by running strace on a test program
that makes
On Monday 22 May 2006 01:58, Steven James wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 19 May 2006 16:09, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > That is more or less my idea, however I've not had the time to work on
> > > it. Instead of changing the semantics we must add another option - I
>
