[uml-devel] non-scalar ktime addition and subtraction broken

2006-06-01 Thread Jeff Dike
The use of 64-bit additions and subtractions on something which is nominally a struct containing 32-bit second and nanosecond field is broken when a negative time is involved. When the structure is treated as a 64-bit integer, the increment of the upper 32 bits that's part of two's-complement subt

Re: [uml-devel] [NEWBYE]

2006-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 01 June 2006 18:09, Alessandro Corradi wrote: > Hi to everyboby, > I'm preparing the degree's thesis about uml. I'm searching about device > forwarding, eg. HOST->ttyS0 <---> UML->ttyS0 > I must see how this connection works. Then I must to handle it for > remapping a virtual device in

[uml-devel] [NEWBYE]

2006-06-01 Thread Alessandro Corradi
Hi to everyboby, I'm preparing the degree's thesis about uml. I'm searching about device forwarding, eg. HOST->ttyS0 <---> UML->ttyS0 I must see how this connection works. Then I must to handle it for remapping a virtual device in the host. Can you recommend me where is the right code to look up? (

Re: [uml-devel] Randomize on MAC address when bringing up ethernet iface

2006-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 23:22, Brock, Anthony - NET wrote: > > -Original Message- > > > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:12:59PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > I've being thinking to this and I'm wondering why we > > > > shouldn't do it. When we > > > > > have set no IP or 0.0.0.0, which is

Re: [uml-devel] Randomize on MAC address when bringing up ethernet iface

2006-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 21:05, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:12:59PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > I've being thinking to this and I'm wondering why we shouldn't do it. > > When we have set no IP or 0.0.0.0, which is not a unique IP, and we bring > > it up, we should choose a rand