From: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fix uml/amd64 prctl()
put_user() there should go to (long __user *)addr, not &addr
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscalls.c
==
On Sunday 04 June 2006 21:06, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It isn't yet perfect, because we don't yet save floating point context.
> > But that will come later. Additionally, there's a potential problem since
> > RED zones will alternate stacks are used, unlike x86_64, so more stack
> > space (128 bytes m
The following patches are small changes which either fix important bugs or
which have no functional effect.
The first one, which adds include/asm-um/irqflags.h should go to mainline
when (or if) the lock validator does.
Jeff
_
Initialize wall_to_monotonic correctly. This fixes a problem where sleeps
lasted about one secone less than they should.
This also called for a bit of code restructuring, following a patch which
Blaisorblade had been keeping.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/ar
This fixes the undefined reference to strcpy seen when building modules
on i386. Tracked down by Al Viro.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.16/arch/um/Makefile-i386
===
--- linux-2.6.16.orig/arch/um/Makef
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 17:43, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:23:42AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > If you need this
> > functionality, implement it yourself. setjmp is most likely overkill
> > anyway.
>
> OK, I'll roll my own version.
What about #ifdef'ing out the offendi
Fram: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uml __user annotations
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/arch/um/sys-i386/syscalls.c
===
--- linux-2.6.17-mm.orig/arc
> It isn't yet perfect, because we don't yet save floating point context. But
> that will come later. Additionally, there's a potential problem since RED
> zones will alternate stacks are used, unlike x86_64, so more stack space
> (128 bytes more) is used. But this shouldn't be a problem.
> Instea
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The problems in this area came to light while fixing a compile failure with
GCC 4, in commit bcb01b8a67476e6f748086e626df8424cc27036d. I went comparing this
code with x86_64 frame construction (which we should ABI compatible with) and
resync
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:19:59PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> What about #ifdef'ing out the offending code #ifndef one of these constants
> (they'll be defined or not altogether). As expectable, this wasn't yet
> implemented - let's give the right priority to things.
> (I've just met this on my
Add an empty asm/irqflags.h, which seems to satisfy the lock validator enough
that UML builds.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/include/asm-um/irqflags.h
===
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.
On Friday 02 June 2006 23:34, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:28:37PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Ok, since I now I'll never finish it:
> > $ ll old-patch-scripts/patches/uml-fix-timers.patch
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 6763 2005-07-24 06:41
> > old-patch-scripts/patches/uml-fix-t
On Monday 05 June 2006 13:06, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 04 June 2006 21:06, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > It isn't yet perfect, because we don't yet save floating point context.
> > > But that will come later. Additionally, there's a potential problem since
> > > RED zones will alternate stacks are
Good afternoon, all,
Ravi Kumar just posted a review of Jeff's UML book on Slashdot:
http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/05/169212
In inimitable Slashdot fashion, the comments currently are a
discussion of whether UML should stand for User-Mode Linux or Unified
Modeli
We had a spurious semicolon somehow.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/main.c
===
--- linux-2.6.17-mm.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/main.c2006-05-01
14:37:32.0 -0400
+++ lin
15 matches
Mail list logo
