On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
>
> Does this do the right thing with something lik
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
Or should we just get together a small fund to send the rema
Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/Makefile
===
--- linux-2.6.18-mm.orig/Makefile
The KSTK_* macros used an inordinate amount of stack. In order to
overcome an impedance mismatch between their interface, which just
returns a single register value, and the interface of get_thread_regs,
which took a full pt_regs, the implementation created an on-stack
pt_regs, filled it in, and r
Since I am shy, I am posting this here (and not to the LKML).
I am including to patch files:
patch-hostfsfix.gz
This one fixes a crash when trying to mount hostfs, an error on how the
mount options were
passed and fixed the setattr to set the time correctly (touch command works
now).
p
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:59:05PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> > I could be wrong, but I trust that thanks to deep and good work
> by
> > who designed locking in the network layer, this patch is correct.
> And
> > indeed I addressed your issues belo
