Blaisorblade wrote:
> Which is the cmd line? With how much memory where these instances started?
Kernel command line: mem=300M fake_ide fakehd con=null con0=fd:0,fd:1
devfs=nomount root=/dev/ubda ubda= 7 ubdb=
eth0=tuntap,encode1_0,fe:fd:46:55:81:95 token_max=40 token_refill=512
> Ok, Jeff,
On Saturday 14 October 2006 03:19, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> >>> This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host.
> >>>
> >>> Kernel file
On Saturday 14 October 2006 03:46, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 05:33, Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> > I know this is not UML specific... but maybe the kernel hackers here
> > can answer this anyway, since I'm doing it to make life with UMLs
> > easier.
> >
> > I've patched the ipv4
On Friday 13 October 2006 05:33, Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> I know this is not UML specific... but maybe the kernel hackers here
> can answer this anyway, since I'm doing it to make life with UMLs
> easier.
>
> I've patched the ipv4 stack so that it does proc registration of the
> IP address for an
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
>>> This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host.
>>>
>>> Kernel file is here:
>>> http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25
>
On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> > This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host.
> >
> > Kernel file is here:
> > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25
> >
> >
> > Kernel panic
On Sunday 08 October 2006 22:01, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> That's it!
> -mm3 kernel is causing this problem, and Your patch indeed fixes it! I
> completely forgot that I was also trying mm patches and I certainly
> mixed them with Your patches :-/
> at least I'm glad that I now know where the problem
On Monday 09 October 2006 20:00, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:38:52PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > If enable is moved by GCC in a register its value may not be preserved
> > after coming back ther
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> Ok, at a first glance this alternative solution is ok. Make sure (run
> gdb on an userspace object file and saying list ) that it
> works and we'll be ok.
After discovering that the original patch broke UML/i386 and broke the
UML/x
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host.
>
> Kernel file is here:
> http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25
>
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c0, ip
> 0x8
10 matches
Mail list logo
