On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:47:14AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> I used to remember open bugs just because I worked on them so frequently.
> However, that work was too time-consuming, and I'm know trying to use my time
> more efficiently.
>
> One of the things which are probably useful is kernel.o
I used to remember open bugs just because I worked on them so frequently.
However, that work was too time-consuming, and I'm know trying to use my time
more efficiently.
One of the things which are probably useful is kernel.org bugzilla. Jeff, what
do you think of this? Could we start _suggestin
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 19:17, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Without any errors, after these messages:
> >
> > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readon
On Thursday 18 January 2007 00:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
> >
> > it hangs giving th
您好!
我公司有发票可优惠向外开出，点数低可到税务验证后再付款！
（销售、建筑、运输、广告、服务、海关缴款书等）！
本公司实力雄厚，与全国各大城市企业公司有发票的业务联系。由于
规模庞大，本公司完全可以依照贵公司的需要进行合作。如贵公司有这方面的
需要，请来电与我公司联系，我们会以热诚的服务来满意您！
联系人：汪先生 电话：0755-2104660513537555766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] QQ:271310075
Antoine Martin wrote:
I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and
running again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just
not an option for some of the amd64 boxes.
>>>
>>> My setup is:
>> Thanks for that. That is very similar to mine.
>> I don't t
>>> I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and
>>> running again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just
>>> not an option for some of the amd64 boxes.
>>
>> My setup is:
> Thanks for that. That is very similar to mine.
> I don't think this has anything to do
>>> Which kernels do you have inside and outside?
>> Host (outside):
>> 2.6.19.2-skas3-v8.2
>
> Okay, that's one big difference. I have a stock kernel (well,
> gentoo-sources) on the outside, not a SKAS3 patched kernel. Maybe that
> makes a difference on amd64?
I wouldn't think so, as it is alwa
>> Which kernels do you have inside and outside?
> Host (outside):
> 2.6.19.2-skas3-v8.2
Note: skas3 v9 has some problems, but I tried that too.
And I wouldn't blame the guest builds either. These guest kernels have
worked for many people in the past, including me. And the image has not
changed.
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 16:14 +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> > I'm the gentoo usermode-sources maintainer, and I run UML almost
> > exclusively on amd64. I have, at any given time, from 4 to 20 UMLs
> > running on my main dev box, most of them 32-bit, and I haven't had any
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:00 +, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Is anyone else having stability problems on AMD64? Or am I the only one
>> using it?
>> Not only is x86 UML broken on AMD64, I am also getting (seemingly)
>> random crashes running 64-bit UML.
>> The Gentoo gue
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:00 +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Is anyone else having stability problems on AMD64? Or am I the only one
> using it?
> Not only is x86 UML broken on AMD64, I am also getting (seemingly)
> random crashes running 64-bit UML.
> The Gentoo guests in particular randomly fail
Is anyone else having stability problems on AMD64? Or am I the only one
using it?
Not only is x86 UML broken on AMD64, I am also getting (seemingly)
random crashes running 64-bit UML.
The Gentoo guests in particular randomly fail to compile code - failing
in completely random places. When you tr
13 matches
Mail list logo
