On Wednesday 17 January 2007 18:15, Pravin wrote:
> Thanx :-)
> Its working now :-)
>
> One more thing that I would like to tell here.
> I did used same compiled kernel on other machine which was having
> 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5.
> And that kernel 2.6.19 without your patch did worked fine
>
> bu
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:46:12PM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Finally someone confirms what I have been seeing for ages!
>> Maybe the devs can find out what is going on now...
>
> OK, can someone give me access to a box where this is happening?
Sure thing.
Just let me know
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:46:12PM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Finally someone confirms what I have been seeing for ages!
> Maybe the devs can find out what is going on now...
OK, can someone give me access to a box where this is happening?
Jeff
--
Work email
Hi,
VIxAGxRA $3. 35
CIxALxIS $3. 75
VAxLIxUM $1. 30
AMxBIxEN $2. 90
SOxMA$1. 15
and many other
http://www.rx555*com ( Do not forget to replace "*" with "." )
--
Harry bent his knees obediently, preparing to spring.
Jump onto the desk...
Why, though? Another voice had awoken in the back of h
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:18:30AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ok, I hope I remembered correctly how to debug such faults (I'm posting the
> full procedure so you can give a look)
Correct.
> 0x619a592f: mov%edx,%fs:(%rcx) #faulting instruction.
This and the registers involved
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:47:14AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> One of the things which are probably useful is kernel.org bugzilla. Jeff,
> what do you think of this? Could we start _suggesting_ users to do that and
> using that as a policy?
Yup, we can try that and see how it goes.
There is a
Hi,
I was playing with user-mode Linux and found that mknod creates
devices node in hostfs with wrong major/minor numbers.
The patch below fixes it for me.
Johannes
---
mknod() is broken on UML because userspace has differernt
dev_t size and encoding than kernel.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezen
