Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:00:49AM +0100, Jacques-Charles Lafoucriere wrote:
I am trying to build and run a UML 2.6.18 machine on a FC6 host.
(2.6.18-1.2798)
Why are you insisting on a 2.6.18 UML?
I work on some kernel product that will be available on RHEL5 whic
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
In most versions, this payload consists of a self-contained craft that
can lower to the surface, detach and operate under its own power.
uk or Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
The manufacturing technique employed should make this feasible.
Ambassador Ronald Neumann was not in the convoy. "
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
x86_64 needs some TLS fixes. What was missing was remembering the child
thread id during clone and stuffing it into the child during each context
switch.
The %fs valu
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: UML - arch_prctl should set thread fs
to the 2.6.20-stable tree. Its filename is
uml-arch_prctl-should-set-thread-fs.patch
A git repo of this tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> That's because it doesn't apply at all to the current 2.6.20.3 kernel
> tree. Can you rediff it for that one so that we can apply it properly?
My apologies - that depended on a previous patch which I thought had
made it into -stable. Bel
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:00:49AM +0100, Jacques-Charles Lafoucriere wrote:
> I am trying to build and run a UML 2.6.18 machine on a FC6 host.
> (2.6.18-1.2798)
Why are you insisting on a 2.6.18 UML?
> I have tried many patches from the list and was not able to be successful
> (hang after VFS:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:16:38AM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Regarding Kernel mode in UML process. This question is on UML TT
> mode
> A UML process wil be in Kernel mode only for executing the getpid(), and
> also some signals is a UML specified stack.
And whenever the UM
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:13:11AM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Regarding Virtual Memory Emulation in UML (TT mode).
> UML will create a file of Physical mem size and it allocates memory to
> UML process by mmap() ing it.
>
> Also in Jeff's article I read that Kernel's text
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:01:40AM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Regarding Context switching in UML.
> Each process running in UML will have corresponding process in HOST.
In tt and skas0 mode, roughly yes.
> So when the context switching in HOST happens, UML has to switch th
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:38:27AM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Is the below flow correct for UML (TT mode)
Maybe, maybe not - your terminology is somewhat confusing.
> 1. UML process wants to execute a sys call say open().
> 2. UML TT comes to know this
By having PTRACE_SY
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
Hi,
I am trying to build and run a UML 2.6.18 machine on a FC6 host.
(2.6.18-1.2798)
I have tried many patches from the list and was not able to be successful
(hang after VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.)
Does the host need a special patch to run recent UML kernel or is it
only an i
16 matches
Mail list logo
