On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:11:48PM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Also from your below response it means that: UML just have a
> task_structure maintained
> Also I never saw the UML specific schedule() code in .../arch/um does
> UML uses the host schedule itself ?
UML, like any oth
Hi Jeff,
But I was confused with the diagram you described here:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/slides/als2000/img4.html
Also from your below response it means that: UML just have a
task_structure maintained
Also I never saw the UML specific schedule() code in .../arch/
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:51:44PM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Regarding fork() implementation UML in tracing thread (tt)
> mode
> Whenever we call fork in UML the following happens:
>
> 2 process gets created
> 1 on UML say U_1 and 1 on HOST say H_1
No, one process
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:23:28PM +0800, Krishnappa Abhijith-A21204 wrote:
> Hi,
> Regarding VM in UML (tracing thread mode).
> Why we need a seprate VM for UML as we create a new process in host for
> every process that created in UML and the new HOST address space is
> provided by Host k
Hi,
Regarding fork() implementation UML in tracing thread (tt)
mode
Whenever we call fork in UML the following happens:
2 process gets created
1 on UML say U_1 and 1 on HOST say H_1
Process in host gets created by tracing thread but how does a process in
UML gets created ?
Also
Hi,
Regarding VM in UML (tracing thread mode).
Why we need a seprate VM for UML as we create a new process in host for
every process that created in UML and the new HOST address space is
provided by Host kernel itself ?
Thanks,
Abhi
--
