On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation.
Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that you
don't have now.
[...]
>> in short:
>> it`s quite some work to be done to have your uml 2.6.21 with root-fs up and
>> running and working cleanly. whenever i search the net for some appropriate
>> UML fs image, those i find are very often old and outdated...
>
> Hmm... I'd think we need a wizard for configuration.
On domenica 1 aprile 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello !
>
> i`m not very much into UML for the last months, but while playing around
> with dm-loop i just got one idea i`d like to share.
>
> Whenever you want to test some new kernel (feature), you may put you main
> system at risk, exactly kn
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
