Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Jason Lunz
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:44:34PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > There are sites (http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ being the best one I know > of) where, with two downloads, two uncompressions, and one command > line later, you have a booted UML. > > The only way I know of to improve on this, aside from inpr

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:40:10PM +0200, roland wrote: > btw - i think besides that packaged uml+rootfs, the same thing could be > distributed in other formats, i.e. qemu, vmware, M$ virtual pc (add your > favourite v12n solution here) There are sites (http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ being the best o

[uml-devel] Odpowiedz automatyczna

2007-04-02 Thread aapsik4
replay - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techs

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread roland
>> Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that you >> don't have now. > Just like the network auto-configuration via dhcp, it would allow users to > download images+kernel and run them like appliances without understanding > anything about X or UML, just click and run. mhh, i a

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 4/4] UML - kernel_thread shouldn't panic

2007-04-02 Thread roland
i´d like to acknowledge that this fixes the problem i had when creating loop-devices inside uml. instead of crashing the whole uml, losetup now tells: ioctl: LOOP_SET_FD: Resource temporarily unavailable and dmesg: Apr 2 20:17:53 localhost udevd[641]: udev_event_run: fork of child failed: Re

[uml-devel] Odpowiedz automatyczna

2007-04-02 Thread aapsik4
replay - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techs

[uml-devel] [PATCH 1/4] UML - no locking needed in tls.c

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
Comment the lack of locking on a couple of globals. Also fix the formatting of __setup_host_supports_tls. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- arch/um/sys-i386/tls.c | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/arch/um/sys-i386/tls.c

[uml-devel] [PATCH 0/4] UML - cleanups

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
These patches tidy up various things and can wait till 2.6.22. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net

[uml-devel] [PATCH 4/4] UML - kernel_thread shouldn't panic

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
kernel_thread should just return an error value on do_fork failure, not panic. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- arch/um/kernel/process.c |2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/arch/um/kernel/process.c ==

[uml-devel] [PATCH 3/4] UML - remove page_size()

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
userspace code used to have to call the kernelspace function page_size() in order to determine the value of the kernel's PAGE_SIZE. Since this is now available directly from kern_constants.h as UM_KERN_PAGE_SIZE, page_size() can be deleted and calls changed to use the constant. Signed-off-by: Jeff

[uml-devel] [PATCH 2/4] UML - tidy process.c

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
Clean up arch/um/kernel/process.c - lots of return(x); -> return x; conversions a number of the small functions are either unused, in which case they are gone, along any declarations in a header, or could be made static. current_pid is ifdefed on CONFIG_MODE_TT and its decla

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> There are patches floating around for a UML frame buffer device. >> Gerd Kraxel^H^H^H^H^H^HHoffmann did one using plain X11, which worked >> great when I gave it a try. >> >> I suggest taking a look at Gerd's

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Just like the network auto-configuration via dhcp, it would allow users >> to download images+kernel and run them like appliances without >> understanding anything about X or UML, just click and run. > > True,

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > Just like the network auto-configuration via dhcp, it would allow users > to download images+kernel and run them like appliances without > understanding anything about X or UML, just click and run. True, but I don't see that as be

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > There are patches floating around for a UML frame buffer device. > Gerd Kraxel^H^H^H^H^H^HHoffmann did one using plain X11, which worked > great when I gave it a try. > > I suggest taking a look at Gerd's patches. IIRC, he poste

[uml-devel] Odpowiedz automatyczna

2007-04-02 Thread aapsik4
replay - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techs

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Gerd Kraxel^H^H^H^H^H^HHoffmann did one using plain X11, which worked ^^ Sorry, this should have been `Knorr'. > great when I gave it a try. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Antoine Martin wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the > >> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation. > > > > Why? I

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the >> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation. > > Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that