On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 07:11:07PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I needed the tiny change below to be able to build on amd64 with gentoo
> kernel headers.
Already in -mm -
http://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=118521982227031&q=raw
Jeff
--
Work e
I needed the tiny change below to be able to build on amd64 with gentoo
kernel headers. posted here just in case it's useful, I can compile both
x86 and amd64 kernels using these headers but not cross compile (make
ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386)
That still fails with:
arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c: In
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:45:56AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
ACK
> sys-i386/fault.c |2 +-
> sys-x86_64/fault.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Except you should probably diff from
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:45:56AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
>> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
>
> ACK
>
>> sys-i386/fault.c |2 +-
>> sys-x86_64/fault.c |2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 de
The previous DEBUG_SHIRQ patch missed one case. The console doesn't
set its host descriptors non-blocking.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c |9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/arch/um/drivers/chan_ker
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@
