On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 14:02 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> + if (is_self_ptracing(regs->gprs[2])) {
> + if (!entryexit) {
> + struct siginfo info;
> +
> + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct siginfo));
> + info.si_sig
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 20:20 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> But... well, I think we need Roland's opinion. I must admit, I am a bit
> sceptical about this patch ;) I mean, I don't really understand why it
> is useful
Yeah, I don't think they're completely coming clean on it, yet.
-- Dave
--
On 09/10, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> >I still think this patch shouldn't change handle_signal().
> >
> >Once again. The signal handler for SIGSYS can first do
> >sys_ptrace(PTRACE_SELF_OFF) (which is filtered out), and then use any
> >other syscall, so this change is not nee
Hello,
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/08, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>> --- linux-2.6.26.orig/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.26/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -409,6 +409,11 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct
>> spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>> }
>>
>>
Hi,
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:02:01 +0200
> Pierre Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] system call notification with self_ptrace
>>
>> From: Pierre Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>> PTRACE SELF
>>
>> This patch adds a new functionality to ptrace: system
