Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> A new instance of user mode linux that I created over the past couple of
>> days worked pretty well except that it had a habit of freezing after a
>> few minutes. Every time it froze, the last message on the cons
A new instance of user mode linux that I created over the past couple of
days worked pretty well except that it had a habit of freezing after a
few minutes. Every time it froze, the last message on the console was
either:
spurious interrupt in ubd_handler, err = 4
or:
spurious interrupt in ubd_
Daolong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 02:23:46PM +0800, Daolong Wang wrote:
>>> I can confirm this link error.
>> In what environment? I see no problems here.
I can also confirm this link error. The problem occurs when compiling
eith
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> A new instance of user mode linux that I created over the past couple of
> days worked pretty well except that it had a habit of freezing after a
> few minutes. Every time it froze, the last message on the console was
> either:
>
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 02:23:46PM +0800, Daolong Wang wrote:
>> I can confirm this link error.
>
> In what environment? I see no problems here.
>
Ubuntu 8.04. Gcc is 4.2.4. Sorry I don't have the access to the machine now.
>> And this patch wo
I can confirm this link error. And this patch works for me.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 14:41:58 Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/sys_call_table.S
>> > b/arch/um/sys-i386/sys_call_table.S index 00e5f52..04147dc 100644
>> >
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 02:23:46PM +0800, Daolong Wang wrote:
> I can confirm this link error.
In what environment? I see no problems here.
> And this patch works for me.
Maybe it fixes the link failure. But I really doubt that sigprocmask works.
Jeff
--
Wor
