Re: [uml-devel] ubd option parsing problem when using cow filesystems in kernel 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread David Fernández
El 19/06/2012, a las 11:03, richard -rw- weinberger escribió: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Fernández wrote: >> Any idea of the cause of the problem? A simple 'diff' between 3.3 and >> 3.4 versions shows the option parsing code has changed significantly. > > Can you do a git bisect?

Re: [uml-devel] ubd option parsing problem when using cow filesystems in kernel 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Fernández wrote: > Any idea of the cause of the problem? A simple 'diff' between 3.3 and > 3.4 versions shows the option parsing code has changed significantly. Can you do a git bisect? -- Thanks, //richard ---

[uml-devel] ubd option parsing problem when using cow filesystems in kernel 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread David Fernández
Hi, It seems that the parsing of ubd option is broken in kernels 3.4.X when using COW filesystems. Let me show the tests I've done so far. When starting a virtual machine using a cow fs without pathname: linux-3.4.1 udba=cow_fs,debian.img it works, but the cow file created is named 'cow_fs,