On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote:
> so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at
> least its reboot functionality got broken
> - if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a fuzzy tool
> running at a remote NFS client under a non-privilege
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:15:24AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Found the root cause, patch is on the way.
I can test patches if you CC me on them.
> > Why do you need to kill UML?
> > Can't you shutdown it?
In the qemu/KVM case it's safe to kill the qemu process, as qemu
catches the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I found by experimentation that killing (SIGTERM) the first vmlinux
>> process only kills part of a UML virtual machine. There are still
>> vmlinux processes (or thread
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I found by experimentation that killing (SIGTERM) the first vmlinux
> process only kills part of a UML virtual machine. There are still
> vmlinux processes (or threads?) running.
>
> Compare the process listings below before and after s
