Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 19:43:47 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 11/30/2013 07:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Sorry for being imprecise, I meant the raw output from UML, not GDB.
> > Currently it looks like yet another cluster fuck within the winch-Thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > //richard
>
On 11/30/2013 07:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Sorry for being imprecise, I meant the raw output from UML, not GDB.
> Currently it looks like yet another cluster fuck within the winch-Thread.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
ah - ok.
This is from the KOnsole starting the UML (FWIW the UML often star
Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 19:19:59 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 11/30/2013 06:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 18:26:45 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> >> On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf
On 11/30/2013 06:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 18:26:45 schrieb Toralf Förster:
>> On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> P
Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 18:26:45 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> >> On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> Please more details.
> >>> Does Linus' tree work?
> >>
On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
>> On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Please more details.
>>> Does Linus' tree work?
>>> Does it crash immediately?
>>
>> Does this helps ? :
>
> Please try Linus
Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Please more details.
> > Does Linus' tree work?
> > Does it crash immediately?
>
> Does this helps ? :
Please try Linus's tree and run it without GDB.
UML now has a complete new
On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Please more details.
> Does Linus' tree work?
> Does it crash immediately?
Does this helps ? :
$ cat ~/devel/my/gdb_uml.config
set args earlyprintk ubda=/home/tfoerste/virtual/uml/trinity
ubdb=/mnt/ramdisk/trinity_swap eth0=tuntap,tap0,72:ef:3d
On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Toralf Förster
> wrote:
>> On 11/30/2013 03:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>>
>>> Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out.
>>>
>>> I do usually use "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts" to start a 3
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 11/30/2013 03:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>
>> Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out.
>>
>> I do usually use "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts" to start a 32bit UML but because
>> the xterm way was fine during the p
On 11/30/2013 03:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out.
>
> I do usually use "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts" to start a 32bit UML but because
> the xterm way was fine during the past few weeks (yes, I know, it was broken
> for a longer tim
Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out.
I do usually use "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts" to start a 32bit UML but because the
xterm way was fine during the past few weeks (yes, I know, it was broken for a
longer time before) and the only change yesterday was to upgrade fro
12 matches
Mail list logo
