Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: kernel: ksyms: Export symbol syscall() for fixing modpost issue

2014-10-24 Thread Chen Gang
Hello Maintainers: Please help check this patch, when you have time. Thanks. On 10/4/14 21:11, Chen Gang wrote: > syscall() is implemented in libc.so/a (e.g. for glibc, in "syscall.o"), > so for normal ".o" files, it is undefined, neither can be found within > kernel wide, so will break modpost.

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2 08/47] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-24 Thread Lennox Wu
Acked-by: Lennox Wu 2014-10-21 12:12 GMT+08:00 Guenter Roeck : > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_power_off instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2 08/47] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-24 Thread Lennox Wu
Acked-by: Lennox Wu 2014-10-21 12:12 GMT+08:00 Guenter Roeck : > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_power_off instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_k

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2 08/47] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-24 Thread James Hogan
Hi Guenter, On 21/10/14 05:12, Guenter Roeck wrote: > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_power_off instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_kernel_power

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2 08/47] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On 21/10/14 05:12, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_power_off instead of pm_power_off. > > Some architectures