Re: [uml-devel] IRQ handler reentrancy

On 11/12/15 08:16, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 11.12.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Anton Ivanov: 2. I cannot catch what is wrong with the current code in signal.c. When I read it, it should not produce re-entrancy. But it does. >>> Sorry for the delay. Until now I did not find the time to dig

Re: [uml-devel] IRQ handler reentrancy

Am 11.12.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Anton Ivanov: >>> 2. I cannot catch what is wrong with the current code in signal.c. When >>> I read it, it should not produce re-entrancy. But it does. >> Sorry for the delay. Until now I did not find the time to dig into that. >> Did you find the offending code in

Re: [uml-devel] IRQ handler reentrancy

On 11/12/15 18:38, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 11.12.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Anton Ivanov: >> On 11/12/15 08:16, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 11.12.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Anton Ivanov: >> 2. I cannot catch what is wrong with the current code in signal.c. When >> I read it, it should

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] um: Do not set unsecure permission for temporary file

Acked-by: Tristan Schmelcher -- ___ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [uml-devel] IRQ handler reentrancy

Am 11.12.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Anton Ivanov: > On 11/12/15 08:16, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 11.12.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Anton Ivanov: > 2. I cannot catch what is wrong with the current code in signal.c. When > I read it, it should not produce re-entrancy. But it does. Sorry for