On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>
>> BTW, I don't think compile warning fixes are trivial enough to go
>> to triv...@kernel.org.
>
>Why?
>
Usually compile warnings fixes go in
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>>> make that work for all host arch, but for
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:09:15PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:09:49PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare th
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Remove duplicates and unused prototypes.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>---
> arch/um/include/asm/system.h |3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/system.h
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
>
Did you meet any build error? If yes, please include it.
Thanks.
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h |2 ++
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>make that work for all host arch, but for now just avoid the clash by
>using an all-upper-case name.
>
Where?
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/kernel/ska
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Already defined in kernel.h. The official version assumes that 'n' is
>power of two - which it is in our case.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:04PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>---
> arch/um/drivers/line.c |1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
>index 7a656bd..7f7338c 100644
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:30:02PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:57:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Frans Pop
>Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>
>If this patch is not pisked up by anyone else I will take it in kbuild.git.
Thanks.
---
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:25:50PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>
>fix the following 'make includecheck' warning:
>
> arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c: linux/limits.h is included more than once.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
>---
> arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c |1 -
> 1 files changed,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:08:58AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>On 06/25/2009 11:06 AM, Paul Menage wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> Paul? we did not receive any feedback from you
>>
>> I split it out into two patches and sent them about an hour ago. (One
>> for
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:52:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi Amerigo,
>
>On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang
>wrote:
>>
>> Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>I would be h
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:23:02PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>On 06/22/2009 05:46 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
>>> UML: Fix some apparent bitrot
>>>
>>> - migration of net_device methods into
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:43:52AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>Stephan hi.
>
>The above breakage is the usual stuff we get every merge window. With people
>doing
>cross arch work and neglecting UML.
>
>Who is the person or people responsible for the large linux-next compilation
>rig?
>Is it pos
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
>UML: Fix some apparent bitrot
>
>- migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops
>- dma_sync_single() changes
>- cpumask_clear() -> cpumask_clear_cpu()
>
>Signed-off-by: Paul Menage
Looks good.
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>
>--
>
>F
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
>>
>>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations:
>>- patched-kernel running patched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML
>>- patched-kernel runn
When I compiled uml on x86_64, I got this warning:
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o (.__syscall_stub.2): unexpected non-allocatable section.
Did you forget to use "ax"/"aw" in a .S file?
Note that for example contains
section definitions for use in .S files.
Because modpost checks for mis
When I compiled uml on x86_64, I got this warning:
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o (.__syscall_stub.2): unexpected non-allocatable section.
Did you forget to use "ax"/"aw" in a .S file?
Note that for example contains
section definitions for use in .S files.
Because modpost checks for mis
18 matches
Mail list logo
