[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] [RFC] uml: add and use generic hw_controller_type->release

2005-05-28 Thread Chris Wedgwood
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:26:15PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Well, that's a point, even because a conditional jump needs to flush > the pipeline when mispredicted (which won't happen on other ARCHs > after the initial period, if this jump stays in the Branch Target > Buffers). Because it's cru

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] [RFC] uml: add and use generic hw_controller_type->release

2005-05-26 Thread Chris Wedgwood
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:39:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Wedgwood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] > This is heavily based on some work by Chris

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] uml help __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0)

2005-03-17 Thread Chris Wedgwood
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:13:37PM -0300, itamar wrote: > I am running the guest kernel with mem=256M does it sound reasonable that 256MB of memory is in use? if so can you trim that down? if this seems too high we need to see if there is a leak somewhere

[uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] uml help __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0)

2005-03-17 Thread Chris Wedgwood
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:52:53PM -0300, itamar wrote: > I am running a uml machine, and I am getting this errors. > > __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) > __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) > __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) > __alloc