On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 14:02 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> + if (is_self_ptracing(regs->gprs[2])) {
> + if (!entryexit) {
> + struct siginfo info;
> +
> + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct siginfo));
> + info.si_sig
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 20:20 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> But... well, I think we need Roland's opinion. I must admit, I am a bit
> sceptical about this patch ;) I mean, I don't really understand why it
> is useful
Yeah, I don't think they're completely coming clean on it, yet.
-- Dave
--
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:03 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to enforce the convention that you may not call
> > dentry_open() with a NULL vfsmount. This is so that the
> > r/o bind mount
I'm trying to enforce the convention that you may not call
dentry_open() with a NULL vfsmount. This is so that the
r/o bind mount patches can consistenty acquire write access
to the mounts there.
This patch fixes up UML's HPPFS to track both the vfsmount
and the dentry for its files. Compile, b
