; >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2013 09:26 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>> Thanks! So this works more or less as expected - trinity issued a
> >>> read at absurdly high offset so we created pagecache page a that
> >>> offset and tried to rea
On Sat 07-12-13 19:06:01, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 02:06 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > One idea: Can you add
> > WARN_ON(offset > 1000);
> > into mm/filemap.c:add_to_page_cache_locked() ? That should tell us
> > whether someone is indeed inserting p
suspiciously large, print also 'i' and some info about the page pvec[i]
page (page->index, page->flags, page->mapping->host->i_sb->s_id,
page->mapping->host->i_ino)?
Honza
--
Jan Kara
SUSE Labs, CR
-
tied : 14
> ick: task_ratelimit: 0
>
> The problem lies in the two "long = unsigned long" assignments in
> bdi_max_pause() which might go negative if the highest bit is 1, and
> the min_t(long, ...) check failed to protect it falling under 0. Fix
> all of the
0x080e7817 in __get_user_pages (tsk=0x48705800, mm=0x45ba3600,
> > start=1084678144, nr_pages=1025, gup_flags=519, pages=0x48558000, vmas=0x0,
> > nonblocking=0x0) at mm/memory.c:1822
> > #17 0x080e7ae3 in get_user_pages (tsk=0x0, mm=0x0, start=0, nr_pages=0,
> > write=1,
ll holding some inode
references to these inodes and thus inodes don't get deleted. So ext3/4
would be just a victim here.
> Furthermore the server won't be able any longer to reboot - it would hang
> infinitely in
Hello Fengguang,
On Tue 08-11-11 15:38:57, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 07:36:57AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> > today I was testing some patch with Linus' kernel from today (commit
> > 31555213f03bca37d2c02e10946296052f4ecfcd) and I rather easily tripp
IO-less throttling code but from the OOM report it
seems there are no dirty or writeback pages so that seems to speak against
that theory.
Honza
--
Jan Kara
SUSE Labs, CR
---
On Thu 05-03-09 21:18:54, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:16 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >
On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under
On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under UML so it can
> > be just some obscure bug in that architecture but I belive it's worth
> > debugging anyway. Now
11 matches
Mail list logo
