Re: [uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd

2006-08-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 13 August 2006 17:41, James McMechan wrote: > >From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [email protected] > >CC: "James McMechan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >[email protected] > >Subject: R

Re: [uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd

2006-08-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 13 August 2006 17:41, James McMechan wrote: > >From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [email protected] > >CC: "James McMechan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >[email protected] > >Subject: R

Re: [uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd

2006-08-13 Thread James McMechan
>From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [email protected] >CC: "James McMechan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >[email protected] >Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd >Date: Sun, 13

Re: [uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd

2006-08-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 13 August 2006 06:10, James McMechan wrote: > I am attempting to resurrect the uml-hcd driver > this version is based off of the gadget/dummy_hcd.c driver. > > I am aiming at a 2.6.12.2 target where it will be used. > I have forward ported it to 2.6.17.6 for testing and hopefully > eventu

[uml-devel] [ link to patch] resurrecting the uml-hcd

2006-08-12 Thread James McMechan
I am attempting to resurrect the uml-hcd driver this version is based off of the gadget/dummy_hcd.c driver. I am aiming at a 2.6.12.2 target where it will be used. I have forward ported it to 2.6.17.6 for testing and hopefully eventual inclusion. This patch has a #PLATFORM to deal with the issues