On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
> it would work.
Are you an archeologist? ;-)
Is there a particular reason why
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
>> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and