Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-18 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 18 November 2005 09:59, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2005 01:58, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > arch/um/sys-i386/built-in.o(.text+0x3b60): In function `load_TLS': > > > : undefined reference to `indirect_set_thread_area' > > > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > KSY

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:58, Blaisorblade wrote: > > arch/um/sys-i386/built-in.o(.text+0x3b60): In function `load_TLS': > > : undefined reference to `indirect_set_thread_area' > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > KSYM.tmp_kallsyms1.S > > nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file > >

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 18 November 2005 08:33, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2005 01:26, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote: > > > On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > >

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:26, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > find . -name asm > > > > > > This all looks the same as I

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > find . -name asm > > This all looks the same as I have here, except for the asm-i386 thing, > > which I don't think mat

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > find . -name asm > > ./include/asm > > ./include2/asm > > > > ls -l include/asm include2/asm > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm > > -> > > /home/la

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 18 November 2005 00:14, Rob Landley wrote: > I grabbed your thursday patches tarball (overwriting the one I had), and > the result is a mess. Your very first patch goes: Nevermind, my script was at fault... Rob --- This SF.Net emai

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > find . -name asm > > ./include/asm > > ./include2/asm > > > > ls -l include/asm include2/asm > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm > > -> > > /home/la

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > find . -name asm > ./include/asm > ./include2/asm > > ls -l include/asm include2/asm > lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm > -> /home/landley/newbuild/firmware-build/tmpdir/linux-2.6.14/include/asm-um > lrwx

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:51, Rob Landley wrote: > find . -name asm > ./include/asm > ./include2/asm > > ls -l include/asm include2/asm > lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm > -> /home/landley/newbuild/firmware-build/tmpdir/linux-2.6.14/include/asm-um > lrwxrwxrwx

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 12:40, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > include/asm/processor.h:19: error: field `tls' has incomplete type > > This is strange. It's complaining about not having a struct user_desc, > which is defined in asm-i386/ldt.h

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 11:40, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message > > copied into allno.config in the source directory. (Did I typo my > > script?) > > Figured it out. When yo

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > include/asm/processor.h:19: error: field `tls' has incomplete type This is strange. It's complaining about not having a struct user_desc, which is defined in asm-i386/ldt.h, which is included from asm-um/ldt-i386.h through the asm/arc

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message copied > into allno.config in the source directory. (Did I typo my script?) Figured it out. When you do a O= build, the allno.config has to be in the object directo

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message copied > into allno.config in the source directory. I did, I think. I followed your recipe. I didn't notice your miniconf was setting CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y. I need to

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:46:55AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > What do you want dumps of? (Keep in mind this is straight -rc1. The usual disassembly. Jeff --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 November 2005 10:37, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > is what I had to apply to 2.6.15-rc1 to get that to work). I think that > > included tls, but since the target system doesn't use it I don't know. > > OK, well your recipe result

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > is what I had to apply to 2.6.15-rc1 to get that to work). I think that > included tls, but since the target system doesn't use it I don't know. OK, well your recipe results in this $ grep MODE obj1/.config # CONFIG_MODE_TT is not s

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:26, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > Sure: > > > > make: *** [arch/um/kernel-offsets.s] Error 1 > > Sorry, I forgot this was x86_64. Try the patches up to tt-options - the > tls stuff doesn't build on x86_64 yet. >

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:26, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > Sure: > > > > make: *** [arch/um/kernel-offsets.s] Error 1 > > Sorry, I forgot this was x86_64. Try the patches up to tt-options - the > tls stuff doesn't build on x86_64 yet. >

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > Sure: > make: *** [arch/um/kernel-offsets.s] Error 1 Sorry, I forgot this was x86_64. Try the patches up to tt-options - the tls stuff doesn't build on x86_64 yet. Jeff -

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:19, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:00:30AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > Kernel panic - not syncing: get_skas_faultinfo : failed to wait for > > SIGUSR1/SIGTRAP, pid = 13213, n = 13213, errno = 0, status = 0xb7f > > Can you try my latest patchset? > >

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:00:30AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > Kernel panic - not syncing: get_skas_faultinfo : failed to wait for > SIGUSR1/SIGTRAP, pid = 13213, n = 13213, errno = 0, status = 0xb7f Can you try my latest patchset? Jeff -

Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-16 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Rob Landley wrote: So I took the rollup patch I posted earlier (which made things work on x86-64), and tried to compile it on my x86 Ubuntu "Horny Hedgehog" laptop. I had to revert the /lib64 change, of course. (I need to come up with a good fix for that.) I also needed to change one more t

[uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop.

2005-11-16 Thread Rob Landley
So I took the rollup patch I posted earlier (which made things work on x86-64), and tried to compile it on my x86 Ubuntu "Horny Hedgehog" laptop. I had to revert the /lib64 change, of course. (I need to come up with a good fix for that.) I also needed to change one more thing: replacing wit