Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-10-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/23/2013 07:41 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:58:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + on

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-23 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:58:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > >> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm > >> issues) and got 2 times a core d

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm >> issues) and got 2 times a core dump >> when I fuzzy test an UML machine with a nearly identical scenario

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-10 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm >> issues) and got 2 times a core dump >> when I fuzzy test an UML machine with a nearly identical scenario

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-10 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm > issues) and got 2 times a core dump > when I fuzzy test an UML machine with a nearly identical scenario as already > described but just shutdowned > both

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-07 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm > issues) and got 2 times a core dump > when I fuzzy test an UML machine with a nearly identical scenario as already > described but just shutdowned > both UML imag

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-07 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/28/2013 07:21 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: > so that the server eith

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-02 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 02.09.2013 18:53, schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 09/01/2013 11:15 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 01.09.2013 18:09, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>> On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrot

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/01/2013 11:15 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 01.09.2013 18:09, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200,

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 01.09.2013 18:09, schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>> On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 201

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-01 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Richardson
richard -rw- weinberger wrote: Thanks for the report. I think I see the problem--after this commit nfs4_set_delegation() failures result in nfs4_put_delegation being called, but nfs4_put_delegation doesn't free the nfs4_file that has already been set by alloc_

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-30 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:10:42PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster > >> wrote: > >>> On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fie

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-30 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >>> On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-29 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: > > On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-29 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: > so that the s

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-28 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-27 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: > > > so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or > > > at least its reboot functionality got broken

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-14 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/13/2013 11:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: >>> so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at >>> least its reboot functionality got broken >>> - if the NF

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-14 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: > > so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at > > least its reboot functionality got broken > > - if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-12 Thread Jan Kara
On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: > so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at > least its reboot functionality got broken > - if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a fuzzy tool > running at a remote NFS client under a non-privilege

[uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-11 Thread Toralf Förster
so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at least its reboot functionality got broken - if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a fuzzy tool running at a remote NFS client under a non-privileged user id. It can re reproduced, if - the NFS s