Re: [uml-devel] Possible SKAS3 >= v8 bug

2005-08-29 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Blaisorblade wrote: Ok, I'm particularly suspicious of one patch, ptrace_ldt-reload-smp-fix, try unapplying that one. I don't know exactly *how* it might trigger that crash, but it seems a data corruption, and that code is doing exactly that. I recompiled 2.6.12.5 with skas-v8 minus the ptrace

Re: [uml-devel] Possible SKAS3 >= v8 bug

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 12 August 2005 02:58, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Perhaps this is related. I've upgraded one of the affected machines to > 2.6.13-rc6. We'll see how it goes... > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11172064042&r=1&w=2 > > -Chris Ok, I'm particularly suspicious of one patch, ptrace_ld

Re: [uml-devel] Possible SKAS3 >= v8 bug

2005-08-11 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Perhaps this is related. I've upgraded one of the affected machines to 2.6.13-rc6. We'll see how it goes... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11172064042&r=1&w=2 -Chris --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EX

Re: [uml-devel] Possible SKAS3 >= v8 bug

2005-08-11 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Found this from in my remote syslog: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 2000 printing eip: *pde = 2a771001 Oops: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU:2 EIP:0200:[<>]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010292 (2.6.11.11-1-bigmem) EIP is at 0x0 eax:

[uml-devel] Possible SKAS3 >= v8 bug

2005-08-11 Thread Christopher S. Aker
For many months now, I've been dealing with host machine instability. Essentially, I'm rebooting at least one host a week (see http://www.linode.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=25 for details). The affected machines are all running a kernel patched with skas3 at least version 8. Only my more recen