[uml-devel] Re: 2.6.14-bs1

2005-11-16 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 00:57, Antoine Martin wrote: > skas3 works absolutely fine. > The only problem I've got with skas3 is that it requires /proc/mm in > the chroot and the only way that I found to do this is to mount it in > there. (SELinux will need some work to allow me to restrict wr

[uml-devel] Re: 2.6.14-bs1

2005-11-15 Thread Antoine Martin
> However, I _did_ test with that GCC and things work ok. So it's definitely > the > hardening patches. Probably. > However, I _can_ test them: > gentoo # gcc-config -l > [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4 * > [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardened > [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopie >

[uml-devel] Re: 2.6.14-bs1

2005-11-14 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 11 November 2005 21:49, Antoine Martin wrote: > > However, I just remembered I have an Ubuntu with GCC 4.0... so I could > > test the thing. > Or you could use a gentoo chroot. (if you leave it to build overnight..) I have Gentoo installed, no problem... it's that actually they don't sup

[uml-devel] Re: 2.6.14-bs1

2005-11-11 Thread Antoine Martin
> However, I just remembered I have an Ubuntu with GCC 4.0... so I could test > the thing. Or you could use a gentoo chroot. (if you leave it to build overnight..) > > I've had quite a few problems with 2.6.14 not booting on 2.6.13 and > > 2.6.14 hosts. (errors have been reported by other users -

[uml-devel] Re: 2.6.14-bs1

2005-11-11 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 04 November 2005 22:39, Antoine Martin wrote: > Hi, > I thought you might be interested in this regression: > make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 defconfig > make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 vmlinux > (...) > CC arch/um/kernel/initrd.o > CC arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o > arch/um/kernel/skas