On Monday 07 March 2005 05:42, Steve Schmidtke wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
Hey, has anyone found the time to put together any patch to workaround the
security bug in uml_net?
Attached are two patches. The first one, uml_net-slip.diff, is the minimal
patch to apply to uml_net. The second
On Thursday 03 March 2005 13:47, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggestions?
FWIW, we have gone off using switch daemon entirely. We are using
simply preallocated tap devices, connected to bridges via normal Linux
bridging controls. Works cleaner and faster, more places to
Blaisorblade wrote:
But an unpatched UML won't work with a newer uml_net binary (for SLIP usage
only and only for closing the interface, I mean), right?
Correct. I think uml_net would need to manage a database of who opened what
to do what you suggest.
I also looked at the versioning for
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 19:53, Steve Schmidtke wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
But an unpatched UML won't work with a newer uml_net binary (for SLIP
usage only and only for closing the interface, I mean), right?
Correct. I think uml_net would need to manage a database of who opened
what to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggestions?
FWIW, we have gone off using switch daemon entirely. We are using
simply preallocated tap devices, connected to bridges via normal Linux
bridging controls. Works cleaner and faster, more places to dump the
traffic from and it allows normal linux traffic
