Hello,
seems like Your patch fixed 64bit guests for me! 32bit ones running on 64bit
guest seem to be still overflowing though.
Thanks!
NiK
> I've not yet looked at that messages, however:
>
> Direct invocations of __const_udelay (see include/asm-i386/delay.h) are still
> broken with the belo
On Thursday 26 October 2006 16:12, Julian Bradfield wrote:
> A few years ago, I reported a problem with mdelay (that it basically
> didn't work) - see
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=103774842828993&w=2
>
> and preceding messages.
>
> I see the problem is still there in
A few years ago, I reported a problem with mdelay (that it basically
didn't work) - see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=103774842828993&w=2
and preceding messages.
I see the problem is still there in 2.6.18 (I find it because I insert an
mdelay(1000) into one of the ubd r
